英国“捕捞配额蹦跳案”判例评述Review of British Fisheries Cases: Fishing Quota Hopping
刘新山,阎铁毅
摘要(Abstract)：
自欧盟共同渔业政策实施以来,英国遇到了严重的"捕捞配额蹦跳"问题。为解决此问题,英国通过立法改变了渔船取得英国国籍的条件,但却被欧盟法院和英国法院裁定违反欧盟法,并对由此给受害方造成的损失负有国家赔偿责任。此案是具有宪法性质的判例,揭示了欧盟法和成员国法的上下位关系、英国法院借助欧盟法院的初裁可偶尔挑战英国议会法、捕捞渔业权是一种特殊的物权类型、成员国承担国家赔偿责任的要件以及欧盟委员会作为欧共体条约守护者的重要地位。另外,该案也显示了西班牙渔业界应对世界海洋渔业管理体制变革和欧盟政治经济一体化的能力。
关键词(KeyWords)： 判例法;捕捞配额;渔业法;英国渔业欧盟;渔业政策
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 刘新山,阎铁毅
参考文献(References)：
- [1]Defra(Department for Environment,Food and Rural Affairs).United Kingdom Sea Fisheries Statistics 2004[R].2005:1
- [2]K P E Lasok.Law and Institutions of the European Union[M].London:Butterworths Tolley,a Division of Reed Elsevier(UK)Ltd.,2001:26-72.
- [3]Mike Holden.The Common Fisheries Policy-Origin,Evaluation and Future[M].Oxford:Fishing News Books,a Division of Blackwell Science Ltd.,1994:41-51.
- [4]C.Robinson,S.Pascoe,A.Hatcher.Why are the Spanish fishing our waters?An economic perspective[R].Research paper 138,Centre forthe Economics and Management of Aquatic Resources,University of Portsmouth,1998.
- [5]The Scottish Office.News Release:1533/98,Scottish fishing communities will benefit from new economic link measures[EB/OL].(1998-04-31).http://www.scotland.gov.the UK/news/releas98_2/pr1533.htm
- [6]Richard Ward.English Legal System[M].London:Butterworths,aDivision of Reed Elseviver(UK)Ltd.,1998:23-24.
- [7]Tim S.Gray.Fishing and Fairness:the Justice of the CFP[C]//Tim S.Gray.The Politics of Fishing.Houndmills,England:Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.,1998:228-250.
- [8]A.Hatcher,A.Read.The Allocation of Fishing Rights in UK Fisheries[C]//Ross Shotton.Case Studies on the Allocation of Transferable Quota Rights in Fisheries.FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 411.Rome:FAO,2001:1-14.